|
|
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | Add your comments below this line. | | Add your comments below this line. |
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| − | This is a test of the public comment section.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Following are suggested upgrades to the GARD Guide:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | - Chapter 6 still needs considerable improvement particularly by adding design considerations for water covers and waste rock segregation/blending. Also the section on costing of ARD prevention and mitigation should be expanded.
| |
| − | - the coal sections need to be reviewed by practitioners outside the SE US coal fields - particularly in South Africa and Australia. (nico testing the comment function)
| |
| − | - the risk based approach could be made more explicit in chapters 5 to 7 and in 9.
| |
| − | - the role of project geologists and considerations during exploration could be expanded in chapter 5
| |
| − | - chapters 6 and 7 need introductory flow charts to assist in evaluating the application of technologies. We were not able to advance the BCARD or U of Utah charts for chapters 6 and 7 respectively
| |
| − | - the European regs section of chapter 3 needs to be written by the Europeans
| |
| − | - as suggested by others - more mini-case studies and also web links
| |
| − | - the executive summary should be translated into spanish, mandarin, french, portugese and russian
| |
| − | - a photo gallery with captions would be helpful - possibly with the mini-case studies.
| |
| − | - overall as suggested by Bob Kleinmann, the technical level of the entire guide should be raised over time
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Keith Ferguson
| |
Revision as of 18:54, 16 July 2009
Click on the [edit] link all the way to the right of the headline above to open an edit window and add your comments. Thank you!
Add your comments below this line.
