Difference between revisions of "Public Comment"

From GARDGuide
(Removing all content from page)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Use this page to leave comments for the editors. ==
  
 +
Click on the [edit] link all the way to the right of the headline above to open an edit window and add your comments. Thank you!
 +
 +
Add your comments below this line.
 +
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 +
This is a test of the public comment section.
 +
 +
Following are suggested upgrades to the GARD Guide:
 +
 +
- Chapter 6 still needs considerable improvement particularly by adding design considerations for water covers and waste rock segregation/blending.  Also the section on costing of ARD prevention and mitigation should be expanded.
 +
- the coal sections need to be reviewed by practitioners outside the SE US coal fields - particularly in South Africa and Australia. (nico testing the comment function)
 +
- the risk based approach could be made more explicit in chapters 5 to 7 and in 9.
 +
- the role of project geologists and considerations during exploration could be expanded in chapter 5
 +
- chapters 6 and 7 need introductory flow charts to assist in evaluating the application of technologies.  We were not able to advance the BCARD or U of Utah charts for chapters 6 and 7 respectively
 +
- the European regs section of chapter 3 needs to be written by the Europeans
 +
- as suggested by others - more mini-case studies and also web links
 +
- the executive summary should be translated into spanish, mandarin, french, portugese and russian
 +
- a photo gallery with captions would be helpful - possibly with the mini-case studies.
 +
- overall as suggested by Bob Kleinmann, the technical level of the entire guide should be raised over time
 +
 +
Keith Ferguson

Revision as of 17:48, 7 September 2009

Use this page to leave comments for the editors.

Click on the [edit] link all the way to the right of the headline above to open an edit window and add your comments. Thank you!

Add your comments below this line.


This is a test of the public comment section.

Following are suggested upgrades to the GARD Guide:

- Chapter 6 still needs considerable improvement particularly by adding design considerations for water covers and waste rock segregation/blending. Also the section on costing of ARD prevention and mitigation should be expanded. - the coal sections need to be reviewed by practitioners outside the SE US coal fields - particularly in South Africa and Australia. (nico testing the comment function) - the risk based approach could be made more explicit in chapters 5 to 7 and in 9. - the role of project geologists and considerations during exploration could be expanded in chapter 5 - chapters 6 and 7 need introductory flow charts to assist in evaluating the application of technologies. We were not able to advance the BCARD or U of Utah charts for chapters 6 and 7 respectively - the European regs section of chapter 3 needs to be written by the Europeans - as suggested by others - more mini-case studies and also web links - the executive summary should be translated into spanish, mandarin, french, portugese and russian - a photo gallery with captions would be helpful - possibly with the mini-case studies. - overall as suggested by Bob Kleinmann, the technical level of the entire guide should be raised over time

Keith Ferguson