Difference between revisions of "Public Comment"
From GARDGuide
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Following are suggested upgrades to the GARD Guide: | Following are suggested upgrades to the GARD Guide: | ||
− | + | * Chapter 6 still needs considerable improvement particularly by adding design considerations for water covers and waste rock segregation/blending. Also the section on costing of ARD prevention and mitigation should be expanded. | |
− | + | * the coal sections need to be reviewed by practitioners outside the SE US coal fields - particularly in South Africa and Australia. (nico testing the comment function) | |
− | + | * the risk based approach could be made more explicit in chapters 5 to 7 and in 9. | |
− | + | * the role of project geologists and considerations during exploration could be expanded in chapter 5 | |
− | + | * chapters 6 and 7 need introductory flow charts to assist in evaluating the application of technologies. We were not able to advance the BCARD or U of Utah charts for chapters 6 and 7 respectively | |
− | + | * the European regs section of chapter 3 needs to be written by the Europeans | |
− | + | * as suggested by others - more mini-case studies and also web links | |
− | + | * the executive summary should be translated into spanish, mandarin, french, portugese and russian | |
− | + | * a photo gallery with captions would be helpful - possibly with the mini-case studies. | |
− | + | * overall as suggested by Bob Kleinmann, the technical level of the entire guide should be raised over time | |
Keith Ferguson | Keith Ferguson |
Revision as of 17:49, 7 September 2009
Use this page to leave comments for the editors.
Click on the [edit] link all the way to the right of the headline above to open an edit window and add your comments. Thank you!
Add your comments below this line.
This is a test of the public comment section.
Following are suggested upgrades to the GARD Guide:
- Chapter 6 still needs considerable improvement particularly by adding design considerations for water covers and waste rock segregation/blending. Also the section on costing of ARD prevention and mitigation should be expanded.
- the coal sections need to be reviewed by practitioners outside the SE US coal fields - particularly in South Africa and Australia. (nico testing the comment function)
- the risk based approach could be made more explicit in chapters 5 to 7 and in 9.
- the role of project geologists and considerations during exploration could be expanded in chapter 5
- chapters 6 and 7 need introductory flow charts to assist in evaluating the application of technologies. We were not able to advance the BCARD or U of Utah charts for chapters 6 and 7 respectively
- the European regs section of chapter 3 needs to be written by the Europeans
- as suggested by others - more mini-case studies and also web links
- the executive summary should be translated into spanish, mandarin, french, portugese and russian
- a photo gallery with captions would be helpful - possibly with the mini-case studies.
- overall as suggested by Bob Kleinmann, the technical level of the entire guide should be raised over time
Keith Ferguson